Croatoan:
Guidepost or misdirection?
When John
White returned to Roanoke Island in 1590 he found the
settlement abandoned and "croatoan" carved on a tree. He
thought this meant that the colonists had traveled south
to stay with the Croatan Indians, but he was unable to
follow up on this clue. Today, archaeologists believe
they have located the site of the main village of the
Croatan and there is evidence that there was contact
with the Roanoke colonists. But is this where they
went? What has been found and what needs to be found to
settle the question?
Charles R. Ewen received his PhD at
the University of Florida (1987). He joined the faculty
at ECU in 1994 and is a full professor in the Department
of Anthropology as well as Director of the Phelps
Archaeology Laboratory. He has just finished his term as
president of the Society for Historical Archaeology.
His research interests focus mostly
on historical archaeology (specifically the contact and
colonial periods). However, like most archaeologists,
circumstances have led him to work on nearly every kind
of archaeology site, from prehistoric villages to Civil
War fortifications and twentieth-century homesteads.
While in NC, Charlie has directed several projects at
Tryon Palace Historic Sites & Gardens in New Bern, Ft.
Macon State Park, Hope Plantation, Historic Bath and has
recently begun a long-term archaeological study of
Colonial Brunswick Town.
Besides
many articles and book chapters, Charlie is the author
or editor of six books, including Searching for the
Roanoke Colonies, (with Tom Shields) and X Marks
the Spot: The Archaeology of Piracy, and a second
volume on piracy, just out, Pieces of Eight: More
Archaeology of Piracy. He is currently working on a
book with Tom Shields to be entitled Roanoke
Reconsidered: What Happened to the Lost Colony.
He lives
happily near the university with his wife Gretchen and
daughter Madeline. His older daughter, Kate recently
graduated from UNC-G and is employed as a graphic
designer in Greensboro (woo hoo!). |